The Centre for Alternative Finance at the University of Cambridge estimates it uses more electricity a year than the Netherlands.


In order to incentivize renewables further, crypto miners could sign long-term agreements to buy green electricity. That’s what major companies like Inc. do to help cut their carbon footprints. It’s helped fuel a boom in renewable power assets in the U.S.

In their research, ARK and Square proposed that a renewable power project could be built without a grid connection, just to power a Bitcoin operation. That would speed up development, but also make the project riskier in the eyes of a lender as the grid connection might never materialize, making a development completely dependent on mining.

But part of the rapid decline in the price of renewables has also been thanks to cheap financing.

If that is not market manipulation, then maybe I do not see it right.

But this will stop as all influential personalities that actually appreciate Bitcoin said that they do believe that BTC existed before Elon, and it will continue to exist after Elon Musk too. So, we can expect the downtrend to soon end and the price of Bitcoin to rise back again.
The key levels here are $46k, $51k, and $55k.

What are your thoughts on Jack Dorsey’s tweets and the market manipulation done by Elon Musk? And do you think that the market will recover in the near future? Let us know in the comments below.

If miners could capture just 20% of wind and solar energy that is delayed on US power grids, BCEI projects that global mining capacity could triple.

Additionally, costs for renewable energy would also see a rapid decline. This is because “bitcoin and energy markets are converging” and BCEI believes that “the energy asset owners of today will likely become the miners of tomorrow”.

However, the argument could be viewed as a justification for bitcoin’s energy consumption.

This begs the question: how much is pristine money – which has never existed in the history of mankind – worth; the answer of which could be found in the trade-off with energy consumption as the network grows.

Subscribeto the semi-weekly newsletter for regular insight into bitcoin and crypto.
Go on.

Elon jack argue bitcoin energy-brunkz

Yes, one could argue about the energy consumption and carbon emission problem of the currency, but that also means that it can be solved with the usage of green energy. And considering how important Bitcoin has become to the economy and companies, it is empirical that Square and other companies will do anything in their power to help change the narrative.

The market manipulator: Elon Musk

Yes, Yes, till now, one could have argued that Elon Musk only tweets about Doge as he loves it.

So, it’s not his fault that the prices act in a way after he does speak about it. But what will you say about the fact that Tesla announced that it bought $1.5 billion Bitcoin and also started to accept it so as to push the prices higher? And then sold it at that high price to announce that it won’t accept BTC anymore, which pushed the price down.

Elon jack argue bitcoin energy-i

The researchers explained that the divergence between renewable energy production and electricity demand could be mitigated by creating an ecosystem “where solar/wind, batteries, and Bitcoin mining co-exist to form a green grid that runs almost exclusively on renewable energy.”

Not only is this doable, it is doable without jeopardising the sector’s profitability.

Following this line of reasoning, the authors go on to describe the bitcoin mining sector as “an energy buyer of last resort” that can be situated anywhere on the planet.

The paper asserts the geographical limitations of renewable power plans, which typically results in energy supply being “either abundant or non-existent”.

The end result is significantly more power than society typically needs for a few hours per day and not nearly enough when demand spikes.

Elon jack argue bitcoin energy-iv

According to a research report, the amount of electricity used for BTC mining is 66 times now as compared to 2015. Considering that number, it is obvious why Bitcoin mining is not a good idea overall.

We also have to take into account the fact that the prices of renewable energy resources are dropping to promote their use.

And if companies sign long-term agreements to use such resources to mine BTC, then it is obvious that the use of energy will be directed there. And other essential stuff that also needs electricity may have to do with the use of traditional resources of energy.

Since Bitcoin mining is also not very stable and has its own problems, it is empirical that banks will also have to charge more interest to businesses providing energy to mining farms.

China is the biggest bitcoin mining country globally.

Entitled ‘Bitcoin as key to an abundant, clean energy future’, the paper argues that ‘bitcoin miners are unique energy buyers’, because they offer flexibility, pay in a cryptocurrency, and can be based anywhere with an internet connection. ‘By combining miners with renewables and storage projects, we believe it could improve the returns for project investors and developers, moving more solar and wind projects into profitable territory,’ it said.

Author and bitcoin critic David Gerard described the paper as a ‘cynical exercise in bitcoin greenwashing’.

‘The reality is: bitcoin runs on coal,’ he told the BBC….

By William Mathis and Lars Paulsson A trio of Jack Dorsey, Cathie Wood and Elon Musk are promoting the idea that Bitcoin mining can be good for the planet actually. That’s not exactly true.

The basis of the idea is that mining crypto currencies uses a lot of power and can be deployed at any time.

That could help a developer make money minting coins at a time when there’s lots of wind or sunshine, but not much electricity demand. Making better use of wind and solar, where power generation can be intermittent, increases efficiency, lowers prices and helps encourage the green transition.

The theory is based on trends that are already happening, regardless of crypto.

The cost of renewable power is plummeting and an increasing share of energy is being supplied by electricity.

A bank would probably want to charge a higher interest rate on a project that plans to sell power to a Bitcoin miner than it would if the customer were Google.

“I don’t know how you’d assess the risk profile of a Bitcoin mining operation,” said Albert Cheung, head of analysis at BNEF. “You kind of want your offtaker to be around for 20 years, or at least 10.”

For now, lots of Bitcoin is being produced by the most-polluting source of electricity. Research from the Centre for Alternative Finance shows that Bitcoin mining is dominated by China, a country currently driving a boom in new coal plants.
In the second quarter of 2020, the latest data available, the world’s biggest polluter mined as much as 65% of the coins.

By comparison, Iceland and other Nordic nations, once seen as a green haven for Bitcoin, were producing less than 1% of the coins each.

The past few days haven’t been particularly great for Bitcoin. Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that the company would stop accepting Bitcoin as a payment method.

After the news, Bitcoin tumbled to a low of $47,500 and then closed above the $50,000 price point. And after that, there were just failed attempts as bears have completely taken over and heavy selling was going on.

But some industry believers haven’t pushed BTC aside just because Elon did. And Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey is an example whose recent tweets show that he is still in favor of Bitcoin.

#bitcoin changes *everything*…for the better.

And we will forever work to make bitcoin better.

There are so many existing incentives that the International Energy Agency expects wind and solar to account for around 12% of electricity demand by 2030, up from 5% in 2019.Wood says the new research ideas — in a paper by her ARK Investment Management LLC and Dorsey’s Square Inc. — “debunk the myth” that Bitcoin mining is damaging the environment. On Twitter, Dorsey said Bitcoin “incentivizes renewable energy.” Musk responded with one word: “True.”

JPMorgan warns of bitcoin weakness as futures get liquidated

Young UK investors choose cryptocurrencies over stocks: Survey

WeWork to begin accepting payments in cryptocurrencies

But there’s still the fact that the mining devours massive amounts of power.

Bitcoin mining now uses 66 times more electricity than in 2015, Citigroup Inc. said in a recent report.

Similar Posts:

Leave a comment